
When the nation’s top meat processor hits the brakes, rural towns pay the price. Tyson Foods, handling around 20 percent of America’s beef, pork, and chicken, has shut down eleven plants across eight states since March 2023, cutting over 7,700 jobs. Perry, Iowa lost a quarter of its working-age jobs when Tyson closed its pork plant on June 28, 2024. Emporia, Kansas saw its 809-person facility shuttered earlier that year.
According to USA Today, these shutdowns reflect a deeper strain on the system: shrinking cattle herds, rising automation, and consolidation. As plants go dark, America faces tough questions about food security and small-town survival.
One Shutdown, a Thousand Ripples

Since early 2023, Tyson has cut over 5,100 chicken, 1,276 pork, and 809 beef processing jobs. Perry’s closure alone wiped out 25 percent of the town’s employment. Agriculture Dive reports the company is streamlining operations, closing older sites to stay lean amid rising costs. Emporia’s production moved 275 miles away, draining the local economy.
Iowa State’s Dr. Chad Hart warns: incomes are down, margins are tight, and job alternatives are few. In Perry, 60 percent of laid-off workers lived in town, many have already left. Closures like this aren’t just economic losses. They uproot lives and fracture entire communities.
America’s Cattle Crisis Hits the Meat Aisle

The U.S. cattle herd is in steep decline. As of January 1, 2025, it dropped to 86.7 million head, the smallest it’s been since 1951. Years of drought, soaring feed prices, and widespread herd liquidations have tightened beef supply. Ground beef prices have climbed roughly 29 percent since 2020, reaching $5.98 per pound in May 2025.
The pressure’s showing on the balance sheet. Tyson’s beef division swung from a $233 million profit in fiscal 2023 to a $291 million operating loss just a year later. And in early 2025, processors were losing an average of $115.97 per head, according to HedgersEdge LLC.
Fewer Firms, Bigger Risks

Today, just four companies control 85 percent of beef and 67 percent of pork processing in the U.S. That’s a massive leap from just two decades ago. Dr. Tina Saitone at UC Davis points out the beef industry’s consolidation has nearly doubled. Tyson’s playbook? Shut down small plants and expand mega-facilities.
But that leaves ranchers with fewer places to sell, and communities with fewer jobs. During the pandemic, meat shortages exposed how fragile this system is. As AgAmerica noted, net margins soared then.
Robots Don’t Clock Out

The new face of meatpacking isn’t a butcher, it’s a robot. Tyson Foods, like other major processors, is leaning hard into AI and automation to handle jobs once done by skilled hands.
Meat+Poultry and academic sources report that these systems cut waste, boost yields, and use real-time data to optimize production. But retrofitting older plants is costly, so companies are building high-tech facilities from scratch. That’s one reason Perry, Iowa lost 1,276 jobs in June 2024, the plant wasn’t modernized, it was shuttered. The roles didn’t evolve, they vanished.
As tech takes over, remaining jobs demand higher skills, leaving blue-collar towns behind. One former worker told CBS News last year, “None of us picked this… I just want everybody to be OK. Because I know how hard this is going to be for a lot of people.” For communities like Perry, it’s a gut punch.
The Domino Effect on Small Towns

When a major plant shuts down, entire communities feel it. About 38 percent of displaced workers end up unemployed or in lower-paying jobs, while 24 percent move away to find work. Perry’s 1,276 layoffs hit far beyond Tyson staff, 76 sanitation jobs and countless support roles also vanished.
Food & Water Watch notes factory farms hire fewer locals and contribute less to local economies. Perry’s plant generated over $200,000 in property taxes annually. There’s a glimmer of hope, though: in May 2025, JBS USA announced a $135 million sausage plant that could bring 500 jobs back to town.
The U.S. Meat Supply Chain’s Fragility

The U.S. meat supply chain is still alarmingly fragile. According to MITRE, a handful of large processing hubs now serve as critical choke points, any disruption at one of them can trigger nationwide fallout.
We saw it during COVID-19, when shutdowns at just a few plants emptied meat aisles across the country. The USDA warns even short pauses at these mega-facilities can ripple coast to coast.
Tyson’s approach, closing smaller plants and shifting output to bigger hubs like Holcomb, Kansas, may boost efficiency, but it erases backup options. If Holcomb goes down, multiple states feel the shock. And that’s exactly why experts say food security needs more than just efficiency.
Efficiency Is Expensive for Communities

Tyson insists these shutdowns are about “operating more efficiently.” Industry insiders echo that line, fewer, larger facilities are the new norm. McKinsey and others argue that automation at scale lowers costs, but it also leaves smaller processors, and the towns that depend on them, in the dust.
In Perry, Iowa, that meant losing a lifeline. Yes, the industry’s under pressure: tight margins, high costs, relentless demand, but the fallout is concentrated where it hurts most. What works on a corporate spreadsheet often guts real communities. And once those jobs vanish, the replacements aren’t coming from the HR department.
The Jobs Aren’t Coming Back

The future of meatpacking is built on code and machines. AI and robotics are taking over the line work once done by humans, delivering more precision and fewer errors. Studies show advanced materials and predictive maintenance tools are helping facilities run longer and smarter.
Emporia’s closure, like others, frees up capital, but there’s no clear trail proving that money directly funds new plants. What is clear: automation is solving labor challenges the old way couldn’t. The jobs lost? They’re not paused, they’re gone. And for towns built around shifts and timecards, it’s an economic erasure. Which leads us here.
The Real Cost of Corporate Streamlining

Tyson’s 11 plant closures and nearly 8,000 layoffs aren’t just signs of change; they’re a blueprint for an industry overhaul. As automation rises and market power concentrates into just four companies, meatpacking is becoming faster, leaner, and far less human.
These aren’t just jobs disappearing, they’re school budgets, local stores, and entire family routines upended. USDA research confirms that losing one major plant can shake the country’s food supply.
We saw that fragility during the pandemic. What’s different now is that fragility is being baked into the system. So the question isn’t if it will break again. The question is whether we’ll be ready when it does.