
Pride Month 2025 is on the brink of a serious financial crisis, as several of the largest corporate sponsors pull back their support, leaving organizers with hundreds of thousands of dollars in budget deficits.
Companies that have reduced or completely withdrawn their sponsorships this year include Amtrak, Anheuser-Busch, Boeing, Citi, Deloitte, Goldman Sachs, Mastercard, Meta, Pepsi, Target, Visa, and Walmart.
This retreat has kept Pride organizers across the country scrambling for alternative sources of money, such as crowdfunding and grassroots community support, to sustain their events and activities.
Causes Behind the Sponsorship Pullback

Corporate pullback appears to be driven mainly by economic uncertainty, political pressure, and a conservative backlash.
The Trump administration’s crackdown on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives has left businesses feeling that they risk litigation and damage to their reputations by publicly supporting LGBTQ causes.
Many companies are also cautious about alienating conservative customers and activists. In addition, economic challenges, including the effect of tariffs and concern over an economic downturn, have caused companies to reduce their marketing budgets, with some cuts affecting Pride sponsorships.
Impacts on Pride Event Budgets Across Cities

The funding cutbacks have hit Pride events in major cities hard. San Francisco Pride is $200,000 short of its $3.2 million budget, New York City Pride is looking at a 20% budget reduction, equating to $750,000, and Salt Lake City has lost half of its funding, about $400,000.
Several other cities, including Washington, D.C., Kansas City, St. Louis, and Houston, also face major shortfalls. These reductions jeopardize the magnitude and quality of Pride festivities, putting some events at risk of being downsized— or even canceled.
Event Planning and Security Risks

The budget cuts impact more than just event festivities; there are potential security risks as well. With increased political tensions and threats against the LGBTQ community, safety is of utmost importance.
However, there is insufficient funding to provide adequate protection. Organizers must balance maintaining celebratory and protest elements of Pride while ensuring participant safety, all within tighter financial constraints.
Crowdfunding and Community Support

Some Pride organizations have sought to make up the difference through grassroots crowdfunding in response to the corporate funding withdrawals.
For example, Minnesota’s Twin Cities Pride raised more than double the $50,000 previously contributed by Target through community donations.
This shift back to community roots reflects a growing desire among activists to rely on corporate sponsorships, which are often viewed as performative or inconsistent in their support.
Corporate Brand Activism in Retreat

Corporate social and brand activism surged between 2016 and 2022 but is now in retreat. Data from Gravity Research shows a 60% decrease in corporate Pride engagement between 2023 and 2024, with almost 40% of companies planning to cut their Pride-related activities in 2025.
Much of that pullback is largely attributed to political pressure from the current administration and fear of reprisal from conservative groups, suggesting a broader pullback from public LGBTQ advocacy by major brands.
Consumer Skepticism and “Rainbow-Washing” Criticism

Many consumers, especially younger LGBTQ individuals, are skeptical of corporate Pride support, often viewing it as “rainbow-washing” — a way to profit off of Pride marketing without having a real commitment to LGBTQ rights.
Surveys indicate just 16% of LGBTQ adults believe companies are supporting Pride because they want to, and 68% view the practice as predominantly business-driven. This skepticism contributes to companies being cautious and reducing their visibility in Pride campaigns.
Political and Legal Pressures Intensify

The Trump administration’s policies have placed even greater scrutiny on DEI initiatives and corporate activism. Federal agencies have threatened investigations and filed lawsuits against companies perceived as supporting LGBTQ causes.
This legal and political environment pressures corporations to scale back support for Pride events to avoid being targeted, further undermining financial support for Pride events.
Impact on Smaller LGBTQ Organizations

The reduction of corporate funding doesn’t just impact the large Pride festivals. It also trickles down to smaller LGBTQ organizations that receive grants and sponsorships from large events.
New York’s Heritage of Pride, for example, might need to cut community grant programs because of budget shortfalls, limiting support for grassroots LGBTQ initiatives and weakening the broader community infrastructure.
Returning to Community Roots and Resilience

Despite the challenges, some activists view the corporate pullback as an opportunity to bring Pride back to its grassroots.
Being less dependent on corporate money could be a good thing for Pride, which should be more about community connection, activism, and authentic celebration.
Organizers are turning toward community collaboration and crowdfunding, signaling a potential shift toward more resilient, locally driven Pride celebrations, prioritizing sustainable change over corporate branding.
Discover more trending stories and Follow us to keep inspiration flowing to your feed!

Craving more home and lifestyle inspiration? Hit Follow to keep the creativity flowing, and let us know your thoughts in the comments below!